Supreme Court rejects Justice Yashwant Varma’s plea over impeachment panel findings in cash-at-home case.
Supreme Court Dismisses Judge’s Plea in Cash Scandal
In a major development, the Supreme Court has rejected the plea of Justice Yashwant Varma, calling it “not worth entertaining.” The judge had challenged the findings of a Supreme Court-appointed in-house committee that recommended his removal following the discovery of burnt cash at his residence.
This paves the way for Parliament to investigate the allegations under Articles 124, 217, and 218 of the Constitution — a step that could lead to Varma becoming the first High Court judge in independent India to be impeached.
⚖️ What the Court Said
A bench of Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice A.G. Masih ruled that:
- The committee was constitutionally valid and lawfully constituted
- Justice Varma’s conduct during the proceedings was not confidence-inspiring
- His challenge came too late in the process
“If you thought the inquiry was illegal, why did you participate?” the bench asked, reproaching the delayed legal challenge.
Justice Varma’s Arguments — All Rejected
In his writ petition, Justice Varma contended:
- The in-house panel had no authority to examine a sitting judge
- He was denied a fair hearing
- The Supreme Court lacks disciplinary powers over High Court judges
- The panel’s recommendation infringed on Parliament’s authority
The court ruled that none of these arguments held legal merit.
Background: The Cash-at-Home Case
- On March 15, firefighters responding to a blaze at Justice Varma’s Delhi bungalow found burnt bundles of cash.
- Varma denied any link to the money, calling the allegations preposterous and part of a conspiracy.
- The in-house panel found enough grounds to recommend removal from office.
- Its 64-page report noted that the area where the cash was discovered was maintained by the judge’s family.
What Happens Next: Impeachment Process in Parliament
- Over 145 MPs submitted a motion in Lok Sabha demanding a probe
- Parliament will now examine the charges under the Judges Inquiry Act, 1968
- If upheld, the motion will be sent to President Droupadi Murmu for final approval
What is Judicial Impeachment in India?
- Judges of High Courts or the Supreme Court can only be removed through Parliamentary action
- Governed by Articles 124 & 218 of the Constitution
- Requires support of:
- 50 MPs in Rajya Sabha or
- 100 MPs in Lok Sabha
- Final step: Approval by the President
Also Read : Why Jagdeep Dhankhar Resigned: From Farmers’ Protest to Justice Varma Case, Key Flashpoints
