Pak Defence Minister Khawaja Asif Makes Wild Claim, Accusing Kabul of Acting as New Delhi’s Puppet Amid Collapse of Peace Talks

Pak Defence Minister Khawaja Asif Makes Wild Claim, Accusing Kabul of Acting as New Delhi’s Puppet Amid Collapse of Peace Talks

As peace negotiations with Kabul’s Taliban government falter in Istanbul, Pakistan’s Asif accuses the Afghan regime of being controlled by New Delhi and issues threats of a “50-times stronger” response if Islamabad is attacked.

The Key Claims & Comments

  • In a primetime interview on Geo News, Pakistan’s defence minister alleged that Kabul was serving as a proxy for India: “Whenever we got close to an agreement … they called Kabul and back-pedalled from the deal,” he said.
  • He further asserted: “India wants to engage in a low-intensity war with Pakistan. To achieve this, they are using Kabul.”
  • On the possibility of Afghan aggression, Asif warned: “If Afghanistan even looks at Islamabad, we will gouge their eyes out … a response 50 times stronger.”
  • The remarks came as talks in Istanbul between Pakistan and Afghanistan, mediated by Qatar and Turkey, appeared to collapse after earlier border clashes and a fragile ceasefire.

Why This Moment Is Critical

  • Pakistan and Afghanistan had recently signed a ceasefire agreement following intense cross-border fighting — the worst in years.
  • With those negotiations faltering, Asif’s rhetoric marks a sharp escalation in Pakistan’s posture: transforming diplomatic pressure into open military-threat language.
  • The accusations carry significant implications: linking India with the Afghan regime frames the conflict as a broader triangular dynamic (Pakistan-Afghanistan-India) rather than a bilateral issue.
  • From a regional-security standpoint, threats of “open war” signal heightened risk of renewed hostilities along the 2,611 km Pakistan-Afghanistan border (Durand Line).

What to Watch Next

  • Whether the Afghan side (Taliban government) issues direct diplomatic replies or retaliatory claims about Pakistan’s role or India’s influence.
  • If Pakistan pursues unilateral action (air strikes, cross-border operations) citing Afghanistan’s “failure” to act — this could undo the ceasefire.
  • The role of mediators such as Qatar and Turkey: Will they attempt to salvage talks or step back in the face of Asif’s militant tone?
  • How New Delhi responds (officially or quietly) to being implicated in this narrative of proxy involvement and whether that shifts India’s regional policy.